Subscribe for updates
Recent Posts
- Federal Court Rejects EPA Attempt to Dismiss Clean Air Act Citizen Suit Against xAI Data Center
- Idaho District Court Reiterates Distinction Between Remedial and Removal Actions Under CERCLA
- D.C. Circuit Rejects Challenge to EPA’s Designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA Hazardous Substances
- Tenth Circuit Clarifies Diligent Prosecution Bar to Citizen Suits under Clean Air Act
- Eleventh Circuit Allows Federal Officer Removal for EPA-Directed Cleanup
Topics
- Data Centers
- State Implementation Plans
- Venue
- NJDEP
- Connecticut
- Pollutants
- Federal Land Policy and Management Act
- Loper Bright
- Agency Action
- Council on Environmental Quality
- New Jersey Civil Rights Act
- Public Trust Doctrine
- Environmental Justice
- Disparate Impact
- Title VI
- Massachusetts
- Evidence
- Internal Investigation
- Citizens Suit
- Georgia
- FIFRA
- Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
- Major Questions Doctrine
- Lead Paint
- Greenwashing
- Good Faith Settlement
- Federal Facilities
- Statutory Notice
- Oil Pollution Act
- Federal Jurisdiction
- Owner Liability
- Court of Federal Claims
- Ripeness
- Renewable Fuel Standard
- Fish and Wildlife Service
- Greenhouse Gas
- Refinery
- Alaska
- Florida
- National Priorities List
- Vapor Intrusion
- Solvents
- Price-Anderson Act
- Solid Waste Management Act
- Personal Jurisdiction
- Successor Liability
- Operator Liability
- Potentially Responsible Parties
- Federal Circuit
- Environmental Covenants
- Apportionment
- National Contingency Plan
- Divisibility
- Water Pollution Control Act
- Strict Liability
- Historic Resources
- Public Utilities Commission
- Utilities
- Hydraulic Fracturing
- Water Use
- PFAS
- Ohio
- Arbitration
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Climate Change
- Auer Deference
- Fees
- Commonwealth Court
- West Virginia
- Forest Service
- TSCA
- Martime
- Asbestos
- Gold King Mine
- New Mexico
- Utah
- Tribal Lands
- Federal Tort Claims Act
- Delaware
- Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
- National Forest Management Act
- FERC
- Chevron Deference
- United States Supreme Court
- Endangered Species Act
- HSCA
- Alter Ego
- Corporate Veil
- Allocation
- Eleventh Amendment
- Delaware River Basin Commission
- Mining
- Intervention
- New Hampshire
- Building Materials
- First Circuit
- Property Damage
- PCBs
- Groundwater
- Natural Resource Damages
- Brownfields
- Innocent Party
- Brownfield
- Environmental Rights Amendment
- Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- PHMSA
- Effluents
- FOIA
- Sediment Sites
- EHB
- Texas
- Missouri
- Pipelines
- Injunction
- Coal Ash
- Spoliation
- TMDL
- Stormwater
- Safe Drinking Water Act
- Colorado
- Michigan
- Drinking Water
- North Carolina
- Bankruptcy
- Clean Streams Law
- Hearing Board
- Civil Penalties
- Arranger Liability
- Sovereign Immunity
- Retroactive
- Tax assessment
- Property Value
- Stigma
- Fair Market Value
- Damages
- Storage Tank
- Energy
- Fifth Circuit
- Electric
- Indemnification
- Arizona
- Ninth Circuit
- Attorney-Client
- OPRA
- Iowa
- Fourth Circuit
- Discovery Rule
- Eighth Circuit
- Taxes
- Administrative Appeals
- Preemption
- CAFA
- Procedure
- Contamination
- Natural Gas
- Residential
- Inspection
- Freshwater Wetlands Protect Act
- New York
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
- Natural Gas Act
- Mercury
- HAPs
- Hazardous Air Pollutants
- D.C. Circuit
- Takings
- Condemnation
- Storage
- Flooding
- Takings Clause
- Fifth Amendment
- Causation
- Spill Act
- NEPA
- Interior
- Mineral Leasing Act
- Tenth Circuit
- California
- Zoning
- Act 13
- Duty to Defend
- Insurance Coverage
- Eminent Domain
- Landfill
- Sixth Circuit
- Private Right of Action
- Illinois
- Water
- Diligent Prosecution
- Subject Matter Jurisdiction
- Citizen Suit
- Arkansas
- Pennsylvania
- Press
- Uncategorized
- Maryland
- Eleventh Circuit
- Montana
- Equal-Footing Doctrine
- Riverbed
- Navigability
- Indiana
- Seventh Circuit
- Breach of Contract
- Public Lands
- Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser
- Green House Counsel
- Equity
- Enforcement
- Laches
- CISWI
- Consent Decree
- Boiler MACT
- EPA
- Rulemaking
- Delay Notice
- Contribution
- Second Circuit
- Declaratory Relief
- NPDES
- Standing
- Dimock
- Medical Monitoring
- Legislation
- Case Update
- Certification
- Louisiana
- Dukes
- CLE
- Privilege
- Decisions of Note
- Work Product
- Expert Witness
- Discovery
- Cases to Watch
- Insurance
- Defense Costs
- Response Action Contractors
- Consultant Liability
- Negligence
- Remediation
- Army Corps
- Rapanos
- Donovan
- Class Actions
- Kentucky
- Farming
- Nuisance
- Hog Barn
- Trespass
- Odors
- Informal Agency Action
- ISRA
- New Jersey
- Administrative Hearing
- Waste
- RCRA
- Railroad
- Cancer
- Combustion
- Emissions
- Air
- Speaking Engagements
- CERCLA
- Removal
- Toxic Torts
- Federal Procedure
- Third Circuit
- Title V
- Clean Air Act
- Statute of Limitations
- Permits
- Cleanup
- Supreme Court
- Superfund
- Cost Recovery
- Statute of Repose
- Multi-District Litigation
- Camp Lejeune
- Tolling
- Marcellus Shale
- Deeds
- Wetlands
- Mineral Rights
- Enforcement Action
- Administrative Procedures Act
- Clean Water Act
- Due Process
- Real Estate
- Exploration
- Drilling
- Leases
- Oil and Gas
- Royalties
Blog editor
Blog Contributors
Showing 2 posts from November 2026.
A recent federal court decision involving xAI’s data-center power generation illustrates a potential limitation on the litigation protection that federal support for data-center development offers: even where the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) opposes a private Clean Air Act (the “CAA” or “Act”) enforcement action, that opposition may not be enough to stop litigation brought under the Act’s citizen-suit provision. Read More »
A question frequently arises under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) as to which statute of limitations applies to cost-recovery actions depending on whether the action for which recovery is sought is a removal or remedial action. The United States District Court for the District of Idaho in October held that construction of asphalt and vegetative barriers under the site’s approved remedial action plan constituted initiation of a remedial action for purposes of making this determination, thereby adding to the body of law concerning this question. Read More »
