Subscribe for updates
Recent Posts
- D.C. Circuit Holds that EPA Does Not Need to Consider Mitigation in NPL Decision
- Ohio District Court Addresses CERCLA Limitations Periods in Dismissing Claim
- Second Circuit Clarifies That There Can Be More Than One Remedial Action Under CERCLA For Statute of Limitations Purposes
- New York Court of Appeals Reinstates Finding That A Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Provides an Exemption from Public Review
- Third Circuit Revives Class Action Odor Lawsuit Against Pennsylvania Landfill
Topics
- National Priorities List
- Vapor Intrusion
- Solvents
- Price-Anderson Act
- Personal Jurisdiction
- Successor Liability
- Potentially Responsible Parties
- Operator Liability
- Federal Circuit
- Environmental Covenants
- Divisibility
- Apportionment
- National Contingency Plan
- Strict Liability
- Water Pollution Control Act
- Solid Waste Management Act
- Utilities
- Public Utilities Commission
- Historic Resources
- Hydraulic Fracturing
- Water Use
- PFAS
- Ohio
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration
- Climate Change
- Auer Deference
- Commonwealth Court
- Fees
- West Virginia
- Forest Service
- TSCA
- Martime
- Asbestos
- Federal Tort Claims Act
- New Mexico
- Utah
- Tribal Lands
- Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control
- Delaware
- FERC
- National Forest Management Act
- Endangered Species Act
- Chevron Deference
- United States Supreme Court
- HSCA
- Corporate Veil
- Alter Ego
- Allocation
- Eleventh Amendment
- Delaware River Basin Commission
- Minimg
- Intervention
- New Hampshire
- Building Materials
- Property Damage
- First Circuit
- PCBs
- Groundwater
- Natural Resource Damages
- Brownfield
- Innocent Party
- Brownfields
- Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- PHMSA
- Environmental Rights Amendment
- Effluents
- FOIA
- Sediment Sites
- EHB
- Missouri
- Pipelines
- Texas
- Injunction
- Coal Ash
- Spoliation
- Stormwater
- TMDL
- Safe Drinking Water Act
- Colorado
- Drinking Water
- Michigan
- North Carolina
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Penalties
- Clean Streams Law
- Hearing Board
- Arranger Liability
- Sovereign Immunity
- Retroactive
- Damages
- Tax assessment
- Fair Market Value
- Stigma
- Property Value
- Storage Tank
- Energy
- Indemnification
- Electric
- Fifth Circuit
- Ninth Circuit
- Arizona
- OPRA
- Attorney-Client
- Iowa
- Discovery Rule
- Fourth Circuit
- Eighth Circuit
- Administrative Appeals
- Taxes
- Preemption
- CAFA
- Natural Gas
- Procedure
- Contamination
- Freshwater Wetlands Protect Act
- Inspection
- Residential
- New York
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
- Natural Gas Act
- Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
- Hazardous Air Pollutants
- Mercury
- D.C. Circuit
- HAPs
- Condemnation
- Takings
- Storage
- Takings Clause
- Fifth Amendment
- Flooding
- Causation
- Spill Act
- NEPA
- Mineral Leasing Act
- Tenth Circuit
- Interior
- California
- Act 13
- Zoning
- Insurance Coverage
- Duty to Defend
- Landfill
- Eminent Domain
- Private Right of Action
- Sixth Circuit
- Water
- Illinois
- Diligent Prosecution
- Subject Matter Jurisdiction
- Citizen Suit
- Arkansas
- Pennsylvania
- Press
- Uncategorized
- Maryland
- Eleventh Circuit
- Equal-Footing Doctrine
- Montana
- Riverbed
- Navigability
- Indiana
- Seventh Circuit
- Breach of Contract
- Public Lands
- Green House Counsel
- Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser
- Laches
- Boiler MACT
- Rulemaking
- CISWI
- Consent Decree
- Enforcement
- Delay Notice
- Equity
- EPA
- Contribution
- Declaratory Relief
- Second Circuit
- Standing
- NPDES
- Medical Monitoring
- Dimock
- Legislation
- Case Update
- Dukes
- Louisiana
- Certification
- CLE
- Expert Witness
- Privilege
- Discovery
- Decisions of Note
- Cases to Watch
- Work Product
- Insurance
- Defense Costs
- Consultant Liability
- Negligence
- Response Action Contractors
- Remediation
- Army Corps
- Donovan
- Rapanos
- Hog Barn
- Kentucky
- Class Actions
- Trespass
- Nuisance
- Odors
- Farming
- ISRA
- Administrative Hearing
- Informal Agency Action
- New Jersey
- Waste
- RCRA
- Emissions
- Combustion
- Cancer
- Air
- Railroad
- Speaking Engagements
- CERCLA
- Third Circuit
- Toxic Torts
- Removal
- Federal Procedure
- Title V
- Statute of Limitations
- Permits
- Clean Air Act
- Cleanup
- Cost Recovery
- Supreme Court
- Superfund
- Statute of Repose
- Tolling
- Camp Lejeune
- Multi-District Litigation
- Marcellus Shale
- Administrative Procedures Act
- Deeds
- Due Process
- Clean Water Act
- Enforcement Action
- Wetlands
- Mineral Rights
- Royalties
- Drilling
- Oil and Gas
- Exploration
- Real Estate
- Leases
Blog editor
Blog Contributors
Showing 2 posts in Brownfields.
In Frazer/Exton Development, L.P. v. United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a takings claim against the federal government relating to environmental contamination because the appellants, current and former landowners of the site at issue, filed their lawsuit more than 6 years after environmental remediation was complete. Frazer/Exton Development, L.P. v. United States, No. 2019-2143 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 7, 2020). Read More »
|
Email|
Comments|
Topics: Brownfields, CERCLA, Cleanup, Consent Decree, Contamination, Damages, Environmental Covenants, Federal Circuit, Pennsylvania, Real Estate, Remediation, Statute of Limitations, Superfund, Takings
New Jersey’s Brownfield and Contaminated Site Remediation Act (the “Brownfield Act”) provides that a “person” who owns contaminated property may be entitled to a Hazardous Discharge Site Remediation Fund Innocent Party Grant (“innocent party grant”) to pay for remediation of the property so long as that person meets two requirements: (i) the person acquired the property prior to December 31, 1983 and continued to hold it until the innocent party grant is approved, and (ii) the person did not contribute to the contamination at the property. N.J.S.A. 58:10B-6(a)(4).
In a decision issued last week, the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division, held that Cedar Knolls 2006, LLC (“Cedar Knolls”) was eligible for an innocent party grant for the remediation of its property even though Cedar Knolls was not technically the same “person” that acquired the property before the statutory deadline. (Cedar Knolls 2006, LLC v. NJDEP, Dkt. No. A-1405-15T3 (N.J. Super. Ct. Sept. 20, 2017)). In doing so, the Superior Court explained that, with respect to owners eligible for innocent party grants, the Brownfield Act was more concerned with the “substance of ownership and continuity than the technicalities of the legal form.” Read More »
|
Email|
Comments|
Topics: Brownfield, Brownfields, Cleanup, Contamination, Innocent Party, ISRA, New Jersey, Real Estate, Remediation
